Commitment To Freedom Of Speech

Commitment to Freedom of Expression

Because Econoclash Review (the “ECR”) is committed to free and open inquiry in all matters, it guarantees all members of the ECR writing writing community the broadest possible latitude to speak, write, listen, challenge, and learn. Except insofar as limitations on that freedom are necessary to the functioning of the ECR, the ECR fully respects and supports the freedom of all members of the ECR writing community “to discuss,” in the words of ECR Editor In Chief JD Graves.

Of course, the ideas of different members of the ECR writing community will often and quite naturally conflict. But it is not the proper role of the ECR to attempt to shield individuals from ideas and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive. Although the ECR greatly values civility, and although all members of the ECR writing community share in the responsibility for maintaining a climate of mutual respect, concerns about civility and mutual respect can never be used as a justification for closing off discussion of ideas, however offensive or disagreeable those ideas may be to some members of our writing community.

The freedom to debate and discuss the merits of competing ideas does not, of course, mean that individuals may say whatever they wish, wherever they wish. The ECR may restrict expression, for example, that violates the law, that falsely defames a specific individual, that constitutes a genuine threat or harassment, that unjustifiably invades substantial privacy or confidentiality interests, or that is otherwise directly incompatible with the functioning of the ECR. In addition, the ECR may reasonably regulate the time, place, and manner of expression to ensure that it does not disrupt the ordinary activities of the ECR. But these are narrow exceptions to the general principle of freedom of expression, and it is vitally important that these exceptions never be used in a manner that is inconsistent with the ECR’s commitment to a completely free and open discussion of ideas.

In a word, the ECR’s fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the ECR writing community to be offensive, unwise, immoral, or wrong-headed. It is for the individual members of the ECR writing community, not for the ECR as an institution, to make those judgments for themselves, and to act on those judgments not by seeking to suppress speech, but by openly and vigorously contesting the ideas that they oppose. Indeed, fostering the ability of members of the ECR writing community to engage in such debate and deliberation in an effective and responsible manner is an essential part of the ECR’s educational mission.

As a corollary to the ECR’s commitment to protect and promote free expression, members of the ECR writing community must also act in conformity with the principle of free expression. Although members of the ECR writing community are free to criticize and contest the views expressed on campus, and to criticize and contest speakers who are invited to express their views on campus, they may not obstruct or otherwise interfere with the freedom of others to express views they reject or even loathe. To this end, the ECR has a solemn responsibility not only to promote a lively and fearless freedom of debate and deliberation, but also to protect that freedom when others attempt to restrict it.